<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 155 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252021</link>
    <description>The government upheld the Order-in-Appeal, dismissing the department&#039;s revision application. The respondent&#039;s filing under Rule 6 was deemed appropriate, with no misdeclaration or suppression of facts. The drawback claims were valid, considering the use of Cenvat credit and duty exemption. The brand rates fixed by Central Excise were upheld, and the revision application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 155 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252021</link>
      <description>The government upheld the Order-in-Appeal, dismissing the department&#039;s revision application. The respondent&#039;s filing under Rule 6 was deemed appropriate, with no misdeclaration or suppression of facts. The drawback claims were valid, considering the use of Cenvat credit and duty exemption. The brand rates fixed by Central Excise were upheld, and the revision application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>