<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 152 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252018</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the assessee could not be penalized for claims disallowed due to retrospective amendments. Relying on SC precedent, the ITAT deleted the penalty retained by the CIT(A) and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 08:14:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 152 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252018</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the assessee could not be penalized for claims disallowed due to retrospective amendments. Relying on SC precedent, the ITAT deleted the penalty retained by the CIT(A) and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>