<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 140 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252006</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleted the penalties imposed under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that assessments of undisclosed income should rely on conclusive evidence from the search. It highlighted the significance of a bona fide belief and concluded that penalties were unwarranted due to uncertainties and contradictions in the evidence, particularly regarding the determination of true sale consideration and capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 140 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252006</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleted the penalties imposed under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that assessments of undisclosed income should rely on conclusive evidence from the search. It highlighted the significance of a bona fide belief and concluded that penalties were unwarranted due to uncertainties and contradictions in the evidence, particularly regarding the determination of true sale consideration and capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>