https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252000 The judgment by Justice G. Raghuram addressed the service tax liability of the Appellant under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 2007. The court found that due to the legislative intervention of Section 100 of the Finance Act, 1994, the service tax liability of the Appellant was erased as they fell within the immunities granted. Consequently, the impugned order confirming the liability was rendered ineffective, leading to the disposal of the appeal and dismissal of all pending miscellaneous applications. en-us Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252000 The judgment by Justice G. Raghuram addressed the service tax liability of the Appellant under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 2007. The court found that due to the legislative intervention of Section 100 of the Finance Act, 1994, the service tax liability of the Appellant was erased as they fell within the immunities granted. Consequently, the impugned order confirming the liability was rendered ineffective, leading to the disposal of the appeal and dismissal of all pending miscellaneous applications. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252000