<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 115 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251981</link>
    <description>The court set aside the rejection of the revision application, ruling that it was dispatched within the prescribed period under Section 129DD of the Customs Act, 1962. The court remitted the matter for further consideration on merits, allowing the writ petition without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 07:49:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 115 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251981</link>
      <description>The court set aside the rejection of the revision application, ruling that it was dispatched within the prescribed period under Section 129DD of the Customs Act, 1962. The court remitted the matter for further consideration on merits, allowing the writ petition without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>