<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251971</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s orders from January and May 2011 due to lack of clarity in the correction made regarding arm&#039;s length price reduction. The Court restored the Appeals for a fresh decision, directing the Tribunal to reconsider the matter without influence from previous orders and allowing both parties to present their case fully. The Court emphasized expediting the resolution of the matter without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 06:38:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251971</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s orders from January and May 2011 due to lack of clarity in the correction made regarding arm&#039;s length price reduction. The Court restored the Appeals for a fresh decision, directing the Tribunal to reconsider the matter without influence from previous orders and allowing both parties to present their case fully. The Court emphasized expediting the resolution of the matter without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>