<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 101 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251967</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that in cases of inheritance, the indexed cost of acquisition for calculating capital gains should be based on the previous owner&#039;s cost, with indexation starting from the year in which the previous owner held the asset. The tribunal&#039;s decision, following a Bombay High Court judgment, was upheld, and the substantial question of law was answered in favor of the legal heirs. The appeals were dismissed with no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 101 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251967</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that in cases of inheritance, the indexed cost of acquisition for calculating capital gains should be based on the previous owner&#039;s cost, with indexation starting from the year in which the previous owner held the asset. The tribunal&#039;s decision, following a Bombay High Court judgment, was upheld, and the substantial question of law was answered in favor of the legal heirs. The appeals were dismissed with no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>