<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 95 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of services provided by Bechtel as Consulting Engineer Service, ruling that the offshore services were not taxable during the relevant period. The liability for any service tax was determined to rest with Sahara, the service recipient, as Bechtel did not have a business establishment in India. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 95 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of services provided by Bechtel as Consulting Engineer Service, ruling that the offshore services were not taxable during the relevant period. The liability for any service tax was determined to rest with Sahara, the service recipient, as Bechtel did not have a business establishment in India. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>