https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251960 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant's activities did not fall under the taxable service of "Survey and Exploration of Minerals, Oil, and Gas." The extended period for demand could not be invoked due to conflicting expert opinions on the distance of the wells from the nearest landmass. As a result, the appellant was not liable for penalties, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251960 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant's activities did not fall under the taxable service of "Survey and Exploration of Minerals, Oil, and Gas." The extended period for demand could not be invoked due to conflicting expert opinions on the distance of the wells from the nearest landmass. As a result, the appellant was not liable for penalties, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251960