<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 92 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251958</link>
    <description>Once a rectified tax demand crystallised on 14.03.2013, interest could not be computed for any earlier period, and instalment payments had to be appropriated first towards interest and then towards principal in accordance with Section 55C of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Department was required to recompute the dues on that basis and furnish a statement to the taxpayer. Collection charges were also found unrecoverable because the recovery process had been initiated without proper credit for payments already made and was later corrected; in those circumstances, the recovery action did not justify such charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:08:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 92 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251958</link>
      <description>Once a rectified tax demand crystallised on 14.03.2013, interest could not be computed for any earlier period, and instalment payments had to be appropriated first towards interest and then towards principal in accordance with Section 55C of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Department was required to recompute the dues on that basis and furnish a statement to the taxpayer. Collection charges were also found unrecoverable because the recovery process had been initiated without proper credit for payments already made and was later corrected; in those circumstances, the recovery action did not justify such charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>