https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251957 The Tribunal rejected the application to recall the stay order due to non-receipt of appeal documents, proceeding ex parte and allowing the Revenue's appeal. An early hearing was granted considering the significant amount involved. The transfer of unutilized CENVAT credit between units was permitted based on verification reports. Discrepancies arose regarding the transfer of capital goods, with evidence supporting the movement of goods but no credit in the books, leading to the appeal's rejection for lack of merit. The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE addressed these issues comprehensively. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251957 The Tribunal rejected the application to recall the stay order due to non-receipt of appeal documents, proceeding ex parte and allowing the Revenue's appeal. An early hearing was granted considering the significant amount involved. The transfer of unutilized CENVAT credit between units was permitted based on verification reports. Discrepancies arose regarding the transfer of capital goods, with evidence supporting the movement of goods but no credit in the books, leading to the appeal's rejection for lack of merit. The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE addressed these issues comprehensively. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251957