<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 78 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251944</link>
    <description>Consideration under a technical assistance agreement was characterised as partly royalty and partly technical services under the India-Austria DTAA. Amounts paid for the right to use technical know-how, information, patents, designs, secret processes and similar rights were taxable as royalty under Article VI. Payments for guidance, assistance and implementation support were taxable as technical services under Article VII only to the extent attributable to services performed in India, with related expenditure deducted. Services rendered outside India were not taxable in India. Contract headings and structure alone were insufficient; the legal character of each receipt required proper bifurcation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 08:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 78 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251944</link>
      <description>Consideration under a technical assistance agreement was characterised as partly royalty and partly technical services under the India-Austria DTAA. Amounts paid for the right to use technical know-how, information, patents, designs, secret processes and similar rights were taxable as royalty under Article VI. Payments for guidance, assistance and implementation support were taxable as technical services under Article VII only to the extent attributable to services performed in India, with related expenditure deducted. Services rendered outside India were not taxable in India. Contract headings and structure alone were insufficient; the legal character of each receipt required proper bifurcation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>