<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 74 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251940</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against capital gains for Assessment Year 1992-93, in line with previous judgments. However, the Court emphasized adherence to the restrictions imposed by Section 34A, limiting the set-off to two-thirds of the allowance. The matter was remitted for reevaluation due to the company&#039;s liquidation status, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and previous judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 74 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251940</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against capital gains for Assessment Year 1992-93, in line with previous judgments. However, the Court emphasized adherence to the restrictions imposed by Section 34A, limiting the set-off to two-thirds of the allowance. The matter was remitted for reevaluation due to the company&#039;s liquidation status, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and previous judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>