<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 67 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251933</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Tax Board and Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), ruling that penalty cannot be imposed solely based on provisional assessment under Section 77(8) of the Act. The Court emphasized that imposing a penalty requires a definite finding by the Assessing Officer and cannot be done casually. It found no illegality in the lower authorities&#039; decisions and dismissed the Sales Tax Revision Petition, stating that no interference was warranted as no question of law was involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 67 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251933</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Tax Board and Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), ruling that penalty cannot be imposed solely based on provisional assessment under Section 77(8) of the Act. The Court emphasized that imposing a penalty requires a definite finding by the Assessing Officer and cannot be done casually. It found no illegality in the lower authorities&#039; decisions and dismissed the Sales Tax Revision Petition, stating that no interference was warranted as no question of law was involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>