https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251932 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that SIPL was liable to pay service tax for activities conducted on behalf of Star Hong Kong, including those involving foreign advertisers. The extended period for raising the tax demand was upheld due to the appellant's failure to disclose essential information in the ST3 returns. Statutory definitions and amendments were interpreted to encompass services provided by Indian representatives for foreign broadcasters, making such services taxable if intended for public viewing in India. en-us Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251932 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that SIPL was liable to pay service tax for activities conducted on behalf of Star Hong Kong, including those involving foreign advertisers. The extended period for raising the tax demand was upheld due to the appellant's failure to disclose essential information in the ST3 returns. Statutory definitions and amendments were interpreted to encompass services provided by Indian representatives for foreign broadcasters, making such services taxable if intended for public viewing in India. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251932