<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 62 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251928</link>
    <description>The appellants, a joint venture of NTPC and Reliance Infrastructures Ltd., filed an application for early hearing of a stay application against an Order-in-Original confirming a service tax demand. The Order confirmed a demand of Rs. 1,59,97,633, dropping a part of the initial demand. The judgment highlighted issues with the categorization of the demand under different services and the inclusion of the value of free supplies in the gross amount. The court allowed the appeal, set aside certain demands, and remanded the case for reevaluation and de novo adjudication. The appellants were granted an opportunity to present their case during the re-adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 62 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251928</link>
      <description>The appellants, a joint venture of NTPC and Reliance Infrastructures Ltd., filed an application for early hearing of a stay application against an Order-in-Original confirming a service tax demand. The Order confirmed a demand of Rs. 1,59,97,633, dropping a part of the initial demand. The judgment highlighted issues with the categorization of the demand under different services and the inclusion of the value of free supplies in the gross amount. The court allowed the appeal, set aside certain demands, and remanded the case for reevaluation and de novo adjudication. The appellants were granted an opportunity to present their case during the re-adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>