<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 43 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251909</link>
    <description>The court declared the seizure of goods as illegal and void, directing the return of the Bond and Bank Guarantee. The petitioner&#039;s exemption claim and delay in investigations were considered. The court ordered the issuance of a show cause notice within four weeks and adjudication within six weeks from issuance, emphasizing timely compliance. The delay in notice issuance was deemed unreasonable, emphasizing the need for expeditious proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 43 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251909</link>
      <description>The court declared the seizure of goods as illegal and void, directing the return of the Bond and Bank Guarantee. The petitioner&#039;s exemption claim and delay in investigations were considered. The court ordered the issuance of a show cause notice within four weeks and adjudication within six weeks from issuance, emphasizing timely compliance. The delay in notice issuance was deemed unreasonable, emphasizing the need for expeditious proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>