<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 34 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251900</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting issues on apportionment of preliminary costs, common amenities, and interest costs back to the FAA for fresh adjudication. The tribunal decided in favor of the assessee on the additional ground concerning the reference to the DVO. The matter of the cost of settlement with the tenant was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 07:49:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 34 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251900</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting issues on apportionment of preliminary costs, common amenities, and interest costs back to the FAA for fresh adjudication. The tribunal decided in favor of the assessee on the additional ground concerning the reference to the DVO. The matter of the cost of settlement with the tenant was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>