<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Duty drawback</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107419</link>
    <description>Textile manufacturer proposes to obtain Central Excise registration and execute a Letter of Undertaking (LUT) to remove excisable goods for export without payment of duty under the Central Excise export rule and to claim duty drawback, noting that cotton fabrics are exempt but garments are the principal export product, and asks whether this approach is correct or if alternative procedures apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:03:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Duty drawback</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107419</link>
      <description>Textile manufacturer proposes to obtain Central Excise registration and execute a Letter of Undertaking (LUT) to remove excisable goods for export without payment of duty under the Central Excise export rule and to claim duty drawback, noting that cotton fabrics are exempt but garments are the principal export product, and asks whether this approach is correct or if alternative procedures apply.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:03:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>