https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251891 The Appellate Tribunal denied the condonation of delay application for an appeal filed 290 days late, citing insufficient reasons such as health issues of legal counsel, departure of another advisor after the limitation period, and a family member's accident occurring post-deadline. Emphasizing the need for substantial grounds and parties' conduct, the Tribunal rejected the application based on Supreme Court precedents, stating negligence cannot justify condoning delays to uphold statutory limitations. Consequently, the stay petitions and appeal were dismissed as time-barred. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Oct 2014 07:20:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251891 The Appellate Tribunal denied the condonation of delay application for an appeal filed 290 days late, citing insufficient reasons such as health issues of legal counsel, departure of another advisor after the limitation period, and a family member's accident occurring post-deadline. Emphasizing the need for substantial grounds and parties' conduct, the Tribunal rejected the application based on Supreme Court precedents, stating negligence cannot justify condoning delays to uphold statutory limitations. Consequently, the stay petitions and appeal were dismissed as time-barred. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251891