https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251889 The court modified the respondent's orders in Writ Petitions challenging deposit and bank guarantee conditions, directing the petitioner to pay an additional 25% of the disputed tax and execute a personal bond for the remaining amount and penalty within a specified timeframe. Compliance would lead to an interim stay pending appeal disposal, emphasizing expeditious resolution and petitioner's cooperation. The court's decision was based on a similar precedent, aiming for efficient case management. The Writ Petitions were disposed of accordingly, with connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed and no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Oct 2014 07:19:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251889 The court modified the respondent's orders in Writ Petitions challenging deposit and bank guarantee conditions, directing the petitioner to pay an additional 25% of the disputed tax and execute a personal bond for the remaining amount and penalty within a specified timeframe. Compliance would lead to an interim stay pending appeal disposal, emphasizing expeditious resolution and petitioner's cooperation. The court's decision was based on a similar precedent, aiming for efficient case management. The Writ Petitions were disposed of accordingly, with connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed and no costs awarded. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251889