<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 19 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the manufacturer&#039;s claim that goods cleared to their sister unit were semi-finished, correctly discharging excise duty liability. The lower appellate authority&#039;s decision lacked basis as facts had been previously verified. The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal, allowing the appeal against duty demand for PVC sheets/films cleared to independent buyers versus the sister unit at Daman.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 19 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the manufacturer&#039;s claim that goods cleared to their sister unit were semi-finished, correctly discharging excise duty liability. The lower appellate authority&#039;s decision lacked basis as facts had been previously verified. The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal, allowing the appeal against duty demand for PVC sheets/films cleared to independent buyers versus the sister unit at Daman.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>