https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251884 The Tribunal considered whether the supplies were job-work transactions covered by Rule 10A or principal-to-principal sales, in the context of a request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay. It noted that the relevant inputs were not supplied by the principal manufacturer, the main raw material was independently procured, and only additives were bought from vendors specified by the brand owners. Relying on the co-ordinate Bench view in the appellant's own matter, the Tribunal held that the transaction did not, at this stage, appear to fall within Rule 10A and that a prima facie case for interim relief was made out. Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery stayed pending the appeals. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Oct 2014 07:07:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251884 The Tribunal considered whether the supplies were job-work transactions covered by Rule 10A or principal-to-principal sales, in the context of a request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay. It noted that the relevant inputs were not supplied by the principal manufacturer, the main raw material was independently procured, and only additives were bought from vendors specified by the brand owners. Relying on the co-ordinate Bench view in the appellant's own matter, the Tribunal held that the transaction did not, at this stage, appear to fall within Rule 10A and that a prima facie case for interim relief was made out. Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery stayed pending the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251884