<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 16 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251882</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and clearance of excisable goods was treated as proved where recoveries from the factory and residence, seizure of raw materials and packed pouches, unaccounted production entries in a diary, and statements of connected persons and suppliers mutually corroborated each other. Admissions regarding raw materials for gutkha manufacture, operation of machinery, and unrecorded production supported the conclusion that goods were cleared without being reflected in statutory records. On that basis, suppression and intent to evade duty were found established, and the duty demand and confiscation were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 07:05:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 16 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251882</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and clearance of excisable goods was treated as proved where recoveries from the factory and residence, seizure of raw materials and packed pouches, unaccounted production entries in a diary, and statements of connected persons and suppliers mutually corroborated each other. Admissions regarding raw materials for gutkha manufacture, operation of machinery, and unrecorded production supported the conclusion that goods were cleared without being reflected in statutory records. On that basis, suppression and intent to evade duty were found established, and the duty demand and confiscation were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>