<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 8 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251874</link>
    <description>The court found that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it did not meet the mandatory requirements, including the absence of reasons indicating that the escaped income was likely to be Rs. 1 lakh or more. Consequently, the court quashed the notice and all subsequent proceedings, ruling in favor of the petitioner and ordering each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 8 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251874</link>
      <description>The court found that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it did not meet the mandatory requirements, including the absence of reasons indicating that the escaped income was likely to be Rs. 1 lakh or more. Consequently, the court quashed the notice and all subsequent proceedings, ruling in favor of the petitioner and ordering each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>