https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166516 Jurisdiction for leave to sue was sustained because the plaint disclosed sales, advertisements, and circulation of the respondents' goods in Chennai, which formed part of the cause of action. In passing off and copyright infringement, the appellant's long prior use, trans-border reputation, and the respondents' slavish imitation of the mark, get-up, colour scheme, layout, and stylised script were treated as establishing a strong prima facie case for interim protection. Delay, laches, acquiescence, and alleged pleading inaccuracies did not defeat relief at the interlocutory stage where dishonest adoption, consumer confusion, and balance of convenience favoured injunction. en-us Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:27:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166516 Jurisdiction for leave to sue was sustained because the plaint disclosed sales, advertisements, and circulation of the respondents' goods in Chennai, which formed part of the cause of action. In passing off and copyright infringement, the appellant's long prior use, trans-border reputation, and the respondents' slavish imitation of the mark, get-up, colour scheme, layout, and stylised script were treated as establishing a strong prima facie case for interim protection. Delay, laches, acquiescence, and alleged pleading inaccuracies did not defeat relief at the interlocutory stage where dishonest adoption, consumer confusion, and balance of convenience favoured injunction. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166516