https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166495 In the absence of any statutory mandate, a litigant who seeks adjournment must keep track of the proceedings and cannot invalidate an order merely because the next hearing date was not intimated by post. Once notice of the case had been served and appearance entered, the assessee was expected to follow the matter after seeking adjournment. The High Court found the assessee negligent in prosecuting the matter and declined interference with the Tribunal's order; the revision was dismissed, though liberty was left to seek recall of the ex parte order if otherwise permissible in law. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166495 In the absence of any statutory mandate, a litigant who seeks adjournment must keep track of the proceedings and cannot invalidate an order merely because the next hearing date was not intimated by post. Once notice of the case had been served and appearance entered, the assessee was expected to follow the matter after seeking adjournment. The High Court found the assessee negligent in prosecuting the matter and declined interference with the Tribunal's order; the revision was dismissed, though liberty was left to seek recall of the ex parte order if otherwise permissible in law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166495