<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 892 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251866</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice for reopening the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it was issued beyond the permissible period without any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts. Additionally, the reassessment proceedings were deemed to be initiated due to a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, which was not permissible. Consequently, the petition was allowed, and the notice under Section 148 was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 892 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251866</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice for reopening the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it was issued beyond the permissible period without any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts. Additionally, the reassessment proceedings were deemed to be initiated due to a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, which was not permissible. Consequently, the petition was allowed, and the notice under Section 148 was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>