<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 891 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251865</link>
    <description>The court upheld that the entire license fee of Rs. 15,68,50,000/- should be taxed in the year of receipt rather than spread over three years. The court emphasized that income accrues when the right to receive it is established, regardless of actual receipt. Additionally, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment was deleted as the court found the assessee&#039;s conduct bona fide and the explanation offered reasonable, thereby allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 891 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251865</link>
      <description>The court upheld that the entire license fee of Rs. 15,68,50,000/- should be taxed in the year of receipt rather than spread over three years. The court emphasized that income accrues when the right to receive it is established, regardless of actual receipt. Additionally, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment was deleted as the court found the assessee&#039;s conduct bona fide and the explanation offered reasonable, thereby allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>