<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 888 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251862</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, dismissing the appeals brought by the Revenue. The Court found no substantial question of law and emphasized that factual findings can only be challenged if they are perverse or based on irrelevant material, which was not the case here. The Revenue was given the option to file an application under Section 254(2) before the Tribunal if they disagreed with any issue not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 888 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251862</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, dismissing the appeals brought by the Revenue. The Court found no substantial question of law and emphasized that factual findings can only be challenged if they are perverse or based on irrelevant material, which was not the case here. The Revenue was given the option to file an application under Section 254(2) before the Tribunal if they disagreed with any issue not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>