<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 882 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that charges like ocean freight collected by the appellant were not solely consideration for services rendered and should not be subject to service tax. The impugned order confirming the service tax demand for the period was deemed legally unsustainable. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with the appellant directed to provide necessary details for examination. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the stay petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 882 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that charges like ocean freight collected by the appellant were not solely consideration for services rendered and should not be subject to service tax. The impugned order confirming the service tax demand for the period was deemed legally unsustainable. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with the appellant directed to provide necessary details for examination. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the stay petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>