<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 880 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251854</link>
    <description>The Tribunal stayed the recovery of the service tax demand components related to discrepancies in ST-3 returns and payments under the Swarnjayanti Gram Swarojgar Yogna program as they were found not taxable. However, the demand related to the International Financial Corporation was not stayed as it did not qualify for exemption. The appellants were required to make a pre-deposit for a portion of the demand, and the recovery of the remaining amount was stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 880 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251854</link>
      <description>The Tribunal stayed the recovery of the service tax demand components related to discrepancies in ST-3 returns and payments under the Swarnjayanti Gram Swarojgar Yogna program as they were found not taxable. However, the demand related to the International Financial Corporation was not stayed as it did not qualify for exemption. The appellants were required to make a pre-deposit for a portion of the demand, and the recovery of the remaining amount was stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>