<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 877 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251851</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that insurance premiums for employees qualify as &quot;input service&quot; for Cenvat credit, following Karnataka High Court decisions. However, premiums for employees&#039; families lack a direct nexus and do not qualify. The matter was remanded to quantify eligible credit, with the penalty set aside due to no mala fide intention. The decision emphasized the importance of following High Court rulings on specific services, clarifying eligibility criteria for Cenvat credit related to employees and their families.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 877 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251851</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that insurance premiums for employees qualify as &quot;input service&quot; for Cenvat credit, following Karnataka High Court decisions. However, premiums for employees&#039; families lack a direct nexus and do not qualify. The matter was remanded to quantify eligible credit, with the penalty set aside due to no mala fide intention. The decision emphasized the importance of following High Court rulings on specific services, clarifying eligibility criteria for Cenvat credit related to employees and their families.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>