https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251837 The Tribunal clarified that under Rule 6A of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, one appeal is sufficient against a composite order-in-original, even if multiple show cause notices are involved. However, if distinct numbers are assigned to different parts of the composite order, separate appeals must be filed for each. The decision emphasized that Rule 6A does not mandate multiple appeals for composite orders unless distinct numbers are assigned. The Tribunal also directed that disputes over office objections should be resolved judicially by the appropriate Bench, ensuring procedural clarity in filing appeals against composite orders-in-original. en-us Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:07:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251837 The Tribunal clarified that under Rule 6A of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, one appeal is sufficient against a composite order-in-original, even if multiple show cause notices are involved. However, if distinct numbers are assigned to different parts of the composite order, separate appeals must be filed for each. The decision emphasized that Rule 6A does not mandate multiple appeals for composite orders unless distinct numbers are assigned. The Tribunal also directed that disputes over office objections should be resolved judicially by the appropriate Bench, ensuring procedural clarity in filing appeals against composite orders-in-original. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251837