<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 851 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251825</link>
    <description>Detained goods in transit were directed to be released on payment of the tax demanded in the impugned notices under Section 67(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The statutory framework treated payment of the demanded tax as the basis for release, and the pending composition notices did not bar such release. The respondent was left free to proceed further under the composition notices, while the petitioner retained liberty to contest those notices on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:26:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 851 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251825</link>
      <description>Detained goods in transit were directed to be released on payment of the tax demanded in the impugned notices under Section 67(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The statutory framework treated payment of the demanded tax as the basis for release, and the pending composition notices did not bar such release. The respondent was left free to proceed further under the composition notices, while the petitioner retained liberty to contest those notices on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>