<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 848 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Terry Towel and Terry Towel Fabrics, regarding the disallowance of Cenvat credit on MS tubes and PVC/HDPE pipes. The Department&#039;s contention that the goods received were not eligible for credit was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the goods in question were indeed eligible for Cenvat credit as capital goods, emphasizing their use in the effluent treatment plant. The Tribunal criticized the Department&#039;s misclassification of goods and lack of verification, ultimately setting aside the disallowance of credit on MS tubes and granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 848 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Terry Towel and Terry Towel Fabrics, regarding the disallowance of Cenvat credit on MS tubes and PVC/HDPE pipes. The Department&#039;s contention that the goods received were not eligible for credit was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the goods in question were indeed eligible for Cenvat credit as capital goods, emphasizing their use in the effluent treatment plant. The Tribunal criticized the Department&#039;s misclassification of goods and lack of verification, ultimately setting aside the disallowance of credit on MS tubes and granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>