<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 824 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251798</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the order of remand for examination of the deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Court found that the Assessing Officer had not properly considered the claim for deduction under Section 54F in previous orders, leading to an oversight in the revision of total income. As the order under Section 154 only focused on Section 54EC and failed to address the claim under Section 54F, the Court dismissed the appeal by the appellant-Revenue, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 07:58:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 824 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251798</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the order of remand for examination of the deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Court found that the Assessing Officer had not properly considered the claim for deduction under Section 54F in previous orders, leading to an oversight in the revision of total income. As the order under Section 154 only focused on Section 54EC and failed to address the claim under Section 54F, the Court dismissed the appeal by the appellant-Revenue, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>