<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 820 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251794</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Public Sector Bank, regarding the liability of service tax on interest received from bill discounting services. The interest from bill discounting was deemed exempt from service tax under Notification No. 29/2004-ST. However, the issue of CENVAT credit reversal was remanded for further determination based on additional evidence regarding the disclosure of facts in the appellant&#039;s returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 820 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251794</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Public Sector Bank, regarding the liability of service tax on interest received from bill discounting services. The interest from bill discounting was deemed exempt from service tax under Notification No. 29/2004-ST. However, the issue of CENVAT credit reversal was remanded for further determination based on additional evidence regarding the disclosure of facts in the appellant&#039;s returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>