<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 819 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251793</link>
    <description>The case involved the taxability of reinsurance brokerage commission received from overseas reinsurers under service tax. The appellants&#039; contention that the service constituted an export was refuted as the service was performed in India without physical receipt of payment in convertible foreign exchange. Consequently, a demand for service tax with interest and penalty was confirmed. The appellant&#039;s request for a hearing on merits without pre-deposit was rejected, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need for a pre-deposit due to conflicting decisions on service tax liability for reinsurance brokerage in India. The matter was remanded for further consideration without expressing an opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 819 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251793</link>
      <description>The case involved the taxability of reinsurance brokerage commission received from overseas reinsurers under service tax. The appellants&#039; contention that the service constituted an export was refuted as the service was performed in India without physical receipt of payment in convertible foreign exchange. Consequently, a demand for service tax with interest and penalty was confirmed. The appellant&#039;s request for a hearing on merits without pre-deposit was rejected, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need for a pre-deposit due to conflicting decisions on service tax liability for reinsurance brokerage in India. The matter was remanded for further consideration without expressing an opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>