<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 812 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251786</link>
    <description>An assessment order that computed turnover for selected months in a piecemeal manner, instead of determining the annual liability on a consolidated basis, was treated as requiring reconsideration. The assessee was given liberty to file objections, and the authority was directed to afford a hearing, examine the matter afresh, and decide it on merits and in accordance with law. The impugned order was set aside and the assessment was remitted for fresh consideration after receipt of objections and personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 812 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251786</link>
      <description>An assessment order that computed turnover for selected months in a piecemeal manner, instead of determining the annual liability on a consolidated basis, was treated as requiring reconsideration. The assessee was given liberty to file objections, and the authority was directed to afford a hearing, examine the matter afresh, and decide it on merits and in accordance with law. The impugned order was set aside and the assessment was remitted for fresh consideration after receipt of objections and personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>