<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 808 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251782</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD found that the adjudicating authority violated natural justice principles by not allowing cross-examination. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of addressing such requests before issuing a final order. The reliance on statements of brokers and transporters was deemed unjustified, and incorrect reliance on a previous case&#039;s order was noted. The Tribunal set aside the initial order, directing a reevaluation focusing on show cause notice allegations, granting a personal hearing, and addressing cross-examination requests. The case was remanded for a fresh consideration based on proper procedures, emphasizing adherence to show cause notice allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:46:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 808 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251782</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD found that the adjudicating authority violated natural justice principles by not allowing cross-examination. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of addressing such requests before issuing a final order. The reliance on statements of brokers and transporters was deemed unjustified, and incorrect reliance on a previous case&#039;s order was noted. The Tribunal set aside the initial order, directing a reevaluation focusing on show cause notice allegations, granting a personal hearing, and addressing cross-examination requests. The case was remanded for a fresh consideration based on proper procedures, emphasizing adherence to show cause notice allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>