https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251780 The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority's decision to set aside the appropriation order and sanction the rebate amount, finding it correct. The Tribunal emphasized the validity of stay orders issued before the amendment, stating that no recovery could be made until the stay orders were modified or set aside. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the first appellate authority's order and granting unconditional waiver to the assessee. This case underscores the importance of balancing assessees' rights with timely resolution to prevent revenue loss and ensure effective adjudication. en-us Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251780 The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority's decision to set aside the appropriation order and sanction the rebate amount, finding it correct. The Tribunal emphasized the validity of stay orders issued before the amendment, stating that no recovery could be made until the stay orders were modified or set aside. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the first appellate authority's order and granting unconditional waiver to the assessee. This case underscores the importance of balancing assessees' rights with timely resolution to prevent revenue loss and ensure effective adjudication. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251780