<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (3) TMI 52 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166476</link>
    <description>Whether a debt written off is deductible under section 10(2)(xi) turns on whether the creditor could honestly conclude the debt was irrecoverable; the statutory test requires an honest conviction based on the debtor&#039;s pecuniary position and contemporaneous circumstances. The analysis emphasises that a creditor&#039;s later conduct and subsequent facts may be admissible to show the creditor lacked that honest belief at the time of writing off. Applying these principles to the facts given-debtor remained active, received further advances, held assets, and later receipts were credited-the write off could not be regarded as an honestly estimated irrecoverable debt and thus was not allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2014 12:22:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (3) TMI 52 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166476</link>
      <description>Whether a debt written off is deductible under section 10(2)(xi) turns on whether the creditor could honestly conclude the debt was irrecoverable; the statutory test requires an honest conviction based on the debtor&#039;s pecuniary position and contemporaneous circumstances. The analysis emphasises that a creditor&#039;s later conduct and subsequent facts may be admissible to show the creditor lacked that honest belief at the time of writing off. Applying these principles to the facts given-debtor remained active, received further advances, held assets, and later receipts were credited-the write off could not be regarded as an honestly estimated irrecoverable debt and thus was not allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>