https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166474 Where an effective statutory appeal was available and had in substance been invoked, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was held ordinarily unavailable, and the grievance of natural justice could be pursued before the appellate forum. The petitioners' writ petitions were therefore not maintainable. On merits, the transit pass under the Andhra Pradesh VAT regime was found non-compliant because the exit check-post officer had not signed it and the prescribed formalities were not satisfied. As due surrender and statutory compliance were not established, the petitioners failed to dislodge the assessment-cum-demand notices, and the challenge failed on merits as well. en-us Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166474 Where an effective statutory appeal was available and had in substance been invoked, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was held ordinarily unavailable, and the grievance of natural justice could be pursued before the appellate forum. The petitioners' writ petitions were therefore not maintainable. On merits, the transit pass under the Andhra Pradesh VAT regime was found non-compliant because the exit check-post officer had not signed it and the prescribed formalities were not satisfied. As due surrender and statutory compliance were not established, the petitioners failed to dislodge the assessment-cum-demand notices, and the challenge failed on merits as well. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166474