<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1072 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166462</link>
    <description>Entitlement to statutory exemption must be tested strictly against the exemption conditions in the relevant tax law, and a breach of private contractual terms cannot by itself defeat that exemption. A transfer by endorsement during transit could not be treated as contrary to public policy merely because it allegedly violated contractual stipulations between private parties. Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and section 34 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 were held inapplicable on the facts, and the exemption claim under section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 required fresh examination on the existing record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:37:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1072 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166462</link>
      <description>Entitlement to statutory exemption must be tested strictly against the exemption conditions in the relevant tax law, and a breach of private contractual terms cannot by itself defeat that exemption. A transfer by endorsement during transit could not be treated as contrary to public policy merely because it allegedly violated contractual stipulations between private parties. Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and section 34 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 were held inapplicable on the facts, and the exemption claim under section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 required fresh examination on the existing record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>