<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 716 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166460</link>
    <description>Classification of the assessee&#039;s goods turned on whether they were steel structurals or corrugated metal sheets under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. On examination of the raw materials and finished products, the Court treated the goods as steel structurals, including angles, joists, channels and similar rolled sections, and rejected the contention that they fell within corrugated metal sheets. The authorities below had reached the same classification on the nature of the goods. The goods were therefore held to fall under entry 2(a)(v) of the Fourth Schedule and not under entry 2(a)(vi), and the challenge to the assessment failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 716 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166460</link>
      <description>Classification of the assessee&#039;s goods turned on whether they were steel structurals or corrugated metal sheets under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. On examination of the raw materials and finished products, the Court treated the goods as steel structurals, including angles, joists, channels and similar rolled sections, and rejected the contention that they fell within corrugated metal sheets. The authorities below had reached the same classification on the nature of the goods. The goods were therefore held to fall under entry 2(a)(v) of the Fourth Schedule and not under entry 2(a)(vi), and the challenge to the assessment failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>