https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251749 Appeals rejected for curable filing defects, including absence of a condonation application, should ordinarily not be foreclosed when the merits have not been examined. The HC held that the appellant's statutory appellate remedy should be preserved where the memorandum of appeal can be rectified and delay condonation can be sought, and it quashed the rejection order. The petitioner was permitted to file the condonation applications, correct the appeal papers, and have the appellate authority consider the appeals in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251749 Appeals rejected for curable filing defects, including absence of a condonation application, should ordinarily not be foreclosed when the merits have not been examined. The HC held that the appellant's statutory appellate remedy should be preserved where the memorandum of appeal can be rectified and delay condonation can be sought, and it quashed the rejection order. The petitioner was permitted to file the condonation applications, correct the appeal papers, and have the appellate authority consider the appeals in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251749