<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 771 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision allowing the adjustment of excess duty payment against short payment during finalization of provisional assessment in favor of M/s BSL Ltd. despite Revenue&#039;s challenge based on unjust enrichment principles. The Tribunal deemed the subsequent appeal against the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order invalid post the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision. Conflicting tribunal views were resolved in favor of the High Court judgment supporting the adjustment. The judgment clarified legal principles on such adjustments and emphasized the binding nature of High Court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 771 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision allowing the adjustment of excess duty payment against short payment during finalization of provisional assessment in favor of M/s BSL Ltd. despite Revenue&#039;s challenge based on unjust enrichment principles. The Tribunal deemed the subsequent appeal against the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order invalid post the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision. Conflicting tribunal views were resolved in favor of the High Court judgment supporting the adjustment. The judgment clarified legal principles on such adjustments and emphasized the binding nature of High Court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>