https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251722 The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside to the extent challenged before the Tribunal. The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the payment of 25% penalty of the tax liability was deemed sufficient based on a High Court judgment. The argument for imposing penalties under both Sections 76 and 78 was dismissed as irrelevant to the factual context of the case. en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251722 The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside to the extent challenged before the Tribunal. The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the payment of 25% penalty of the tax liability was deemed sufficient based on a High Court judgment. The argument for imposing penalties under both Sections 76 and 78 was dismissed as irrelevant to the factual context of the case. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251722