<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 746 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the petitioner&#039;s services as &quot;works contract&quot; under EPC projects for the State of Andhra Pradesh, subjecting them to service tax under Section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994. Despite the petitioner&#039;s argument for classification under &quot;commercial or industrial construction&quot; service, citing a High Court interim order, the Tribunal relied on statutory provisions and precedent to affirm the service tax levy. Additionally, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of proceedings for the adjudicated liability, contingent on timely remittance of assessed tax and interest, with non-compliance leading to appeal rejection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 746 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the petitioner&#039;s services as &quot;works contract&quot; under EPC projects for the State of Andhra Pradesh, subjecting them to service tax under Section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994. Despite the petitioner&#039;s argument for classification under &quot;commercial or industrial construction&quot; service, citing a High Court interim order, the Tribunal relied on statutory provisions and precedent to affirm the service tax levy. Additionally, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of proceedings for the adjudicated liability, contingent on timely remittance of assessed tax and interest, with non-compliance leading to appeal rejection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>